Posted by John Doe 2 on 08/07/2023 07:11:28:
…
Clocks made, perhaps 20 years ago – even the cheap ones – were probably better designed and built – with better bearings for example – than they are now?
I'm afraid the 'better in the past' perception is mostly an age thing John. Old men have ended up convinced the world is going to the dogs throughout history. Actually it's us who are in decline.
The general thrust of technology is upward. Better understanding of materials and improved techniques mean modern industry routinely makes stuff that was impossible 20 years ago.
The benefit isn't always improved 'quality'. I believe it was George Stephenson who said 'An engineer is a man who can do for a pound what any fool can do for a guinea.' Cost control has always been a top-priority in engineering because although customers burble nonsense about the importance of 'quality', they're extremely reluctant to pay for it! So professional engineers have to target what people will actually pay for with products that are 'good enough' and 'value for money'.
Sadly there's a huge difference between what most people say they want, and what they actually buy. It's because many things in life compete for our time and money. Most people, most of the time, buy the cheapest that does the job, not the best available. The best is expensive. You can't just pile on 'quality' and expect it to sell
Clocks are a good example of mixed results. Quartz movements consist of an accurate crystal oscillator, an electronic divider, and a simple motor and gear-train. The gears are plastic. The divider contains several hundred transistors, that before 1960, would have filled a 19" equipment rack with unreliable valves and cost as much as new car. The crystal is high-tech synthetic quartz, grown and cut in a specific way, and only cheap because they're mass-produced in billions. The movements are reliable without special bearings, and normally last at least 5 years. Apart from an occasional new battery, zero maintenance; replace on failure. In terms of accuracy, they beat most mechanical clocks hollow. For most purposes they are 'good enough', and more reliable in the short and medium term. But they will never become family heirlooms!
The bearings in an ordinary cheap clock are 'fit for purpose', not the best modern industry can do. Computer hard-drive bearings are considerably more impressive – take one apart! Hard drive technology is well beyond anything that could be made with a Myford, or by anyone in the world in the 20th Century, and now they cost as little as £15.
Alas and alack, old simplicities have gone . Brand-names are untrustworthy, and cost isn't a sure fire indicator of quality.
Disposable goods were enthusiastically adopted by Boomers. We are all guilty. Not a good thing in my opinion, because disposable isn't sustainable in the long run. It will have to change and grandad will hate it, because it will cost him money!
Dave