Posted by duncan webster on 24/09/2023 22:42:03:
Water has a far higher heat capacity than glass … so I think you'd be better of with just water…
A sound engineering explanation for why heating and cooling systems often contain water!
Not the whole story though. Water being liquid adds an extra problem, which is the need for leak-proof containment. That bumps up the initial cost and adds a maintenance problem. In contrast glass doesn't require a well-made container, the system is low maintenance, and sand on the carpet is trivial compared with hot dirty water. However, for a little more dosh, cast-iron or fire-brick store more heat than glass, which might be important.
Solid heat storage systems create a new problem: how is the heat to be transferred to where it's needed? Hot water can be piped through radiators. Solid usually means fan-blown air, requiring trunking etc. Despite needing a fan, the system is much more reliable than gas central heating, which might be more important.
Which brings us to the cost of fuel : gas is cheap (at the moment), electricity expensive (at the moment). Coal is messy hard work and has to be delivered into a bunker. Oil is cleaner, fairly cheap (at the moment), and has to be pumped into a large storage tank. Wood is hard work, needs dry cover, and the cost depends on where you live.
My view is all heating systems have pros and cons, making it unwise to generalise. Engineers have to understand the full requirement and come up with a matching answer. Considering the full requirement often changes the answer, for example, Vehicle Diesel Heaters come with a long list of disadvantages making them inappropriate for heating homes. In the same way, the clean convenience of electricity often outweighs the advantage of cheap fuel, and costly but reliable local fuel is a better bet than unreliable cheap imports. There are many possibilities, and few shortcuts!
Dave