I'm envious of that agate notch-block. Before I made my steel version I was contemplating some sort of jewelling, but I decided that it would take me too long to master the technique. I'll try to get a picture of mine, but my macro photos never look very good. The differences in shape from the agate version are: the notch is a right angle whereas the agate one looks rather more than 90 degrees; my entrance ramp is linear rather than a curve; my exit edge is another right angle – this is the most interesting difference, the agate version clearly has a flat top. I'll try that on my next version.
Yes, the decay between swings measured at that exit edge is going to be very small. I wish I could think of a non-invasive way of measuring the pendulum position, but I've yet to think of one, especially one with that sort of resolution.
Yes, leaving it alone might have been the best advice. The clock was working reasonably well until my wife wanted it off the wall to make way for decorating. While it's off the wall, I thought, I'll just have another go….
The slightly mysterious good news is that over the last 24 hours the proportion of impulses where the toggle sticks has gone right down, not to zero, but probably now only once an hour. I can think of only two explanations: the steel edge has trimmed off some of the brass toggle and improved its shape or the draining battery has changed the magnitude of the impulse to a level where, by chance, the decaying swing doesn't hit the edge but drops neatly on either side. Time will tell, but one reason I swapped the materials was that the steel toggle was cutting grooves in the notch block, making the sticking worse, the new hard steel version should avoid that, but possibly at the expense of the brass toggle.
regards
Graham