Be a little wary of what old chaps recommend because the world changes! My career was spent in and around computing. When I started as a programmer it was simple: COBOL or FORTRAN. Later it got much more complicated, dBase2, C, perl, PHP, C++, 4GLs, and software generators. Academia favoured teaching languages, notably BASIC and PASCAL that were almost unknown in commerce. Later learning on BASIC was seen by employers as a positive disadvantage because the transitional form of the language is stuffed with ideas that have to be unlearned and it encourages bad habits. 10 years after that, and improved versions of BASIC and PASCAL were in demand. This made looking for work 'interesting', and I think CAD/CAM is a similar problem.
My point is that when looking to develop skills you have to keep an eye on what the job market wants and where it's likely to go in future. What Model Engineers like and prefer may not be a good guide.
I suggest you start by analysing as many job adverts as you can because they give you a good idea what employers are looking for at the moment, what they pay, and of course, where the jobs are.
For example, I did a quick check of one site (TotalJobs) – the sample is too small to be representative but:
- More CAM jobs than CAD are advertised.
- CAD jobs are tend to be associated with Estimating, and/or Sheet Metal work, and wider responsibilities including Supervision, and are higher paid.
- CAM jobs mention FANUC most, also Acrumatic, ISO, Hurco, Heidenham, Mazak, Prototrak, Alpha-CAM and One-CNC. I suspect these tools are all G-Code related, and further research would be needed to prove that. FANUC is (I think) almost industry standard, but knowing what the alternatives are and something of them is likely to go down well at a job interview – it shows you take an intelligent interest. Keeping an open mind about tools suggests you might cope better with change than others.
- Of the CAD tools mentioned, Solidworks is called for most often, but also Vero, Radan and AutoCAD. (I haven't read all the job adverts,)
- Not all the jobs specify a particular tool, some ask only or experience in the area.
- Worth checking what other skills or competencies the adverts ask for in addition to the tools. For example, at least two of the higher paid CAD posts involve managing Health and Safety on the work-floor as well as driving a software in an office.
Breaking into a job market can be difficult. The happy days when employers took on inexperienced youths as apprentices and took a few years to make them useful have pretty much gone. Now the best way to get a job is to have previous experience, ideally with a proven track-record. There is a way in though – when an employer can't find ideal candidates he will drop his requirements. Say you want to recruit an experienced Alibre practitioner and no-one applies. But you do have an keen chap who has done the MEW course and thoroughly practiced with the product, perhaps turning up with a portfolio showing what he's done. There's a good chance they'll take you on. And, even if they're not an Alibre shop, because the principles of 3D CAD is 'similar', they might even take the risk and retrain you in their preferred package. Likewise with CAM software – knowing about G-code is an entry to most of them.
Personally, I'm not following the Alibre offer in MEW because I'm already into the 'free' version of Fusion 360. It's from the AutoCAD stable and the business model appears to be using a free version to encourage large numbers of people to learn the product (which might change employer preferences in the event that Fusion360 trained people are easier to recruit) and also to improve the product by allowing many different people to test it and suggest improvements. Will it remain 'free' forever – dunno.
Good luck
Dave