Bob: I hope you're having a more successful day than me! I used to set tool lengths by touching off each tool, making a note of Z and then entering that Z each time I changed tools. Like you I forgot to hit 'Enter' and drove a M3 tap straight into the work before the spindle started. It was episodes like that, and the realisation that I was avoiding tool changes, that made me buy the tool setter. Once I got a routine sorted it was quick and easy to set tool lengths, although Mach3 was a bit clunky about actually applying and saving them.
I've wasted a good chunk of the day trying to get tool setting to work. I've watched the Tormach, and other, videos on tool setting in PathPilot. Like you say it uses the spindle nose to reference zero and hence all real tool lengths are positive. It's not clear if that is a necessity, but it's not how I work. There's no way I want the spindle nose to be my reference. With some of the parts I make it would difficult or impossible to set the Z work offset using the spindle nose. There is quite a lot of comment on the forums about tool setting not working in PathPilot with the ETS – it's beginning to look like they still haven't fixed it. Nor does it work like the video says. Trying to touch off with tool 0, ie the spindle nose, simply says that tool 0 is invalid.
PathPilot has cleaner and more consistent screens than Mach3, but it is looking like there are some small, and big, deficiencies. One irritation is the lack of a 'Ref All' button. After all on power up why wouldn't you be referencing all axes? I'm beginning to suspect that the tool setting issues may be a deal breaker for me, and I'll be going back to Mach3. I want to make parts not **** about with software.
I've composed and sent a message to Tormach – we'll see what response I get tomorrow.
To sum up so far the Scouse expression 'All fur coat and no knickers' is beginning to look apposite.
Andrew