Manufactured by Solway Tool and Gauge, at least they were, but the guy who ran it must have retired by now. They are initially attractive as they eliminate the gap between the ends of the ring, but another source of leakage is down one side, underneath and up the other. Two rings in 2 grooves give a much more tortuous path for this. As far as I know none of the big railways used Clupet, they used lots of narrow rings in separate grooves.
I once had a chap enthusing about Clupet, his engine was leaking badly, so he re-bored it and fitted Clupets, after which it leaked a lot less. Doesn't prove a thing, 2 conventional rings in 2 grooves might well have been just as good if not better, in fact 2 rings in one groove with the gaps offset would be worth a try.