Vibration and exploring the Fast Fourier Transform with CAD

Advert

Vibration and exploring the Fast Fourier Transform with CAD

Home Forums CAD – Technical drawing & design Vibration and exploring the Fast Fourier Transform with CAD

Viewing 5 posts - 51 through 55 (of 55 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #787958
    Julie Ann
    Participant
      @julieann
      On Frances IoM Said:

      there’s nothing special about sinusoids (tho convenient) – any pair of mutually orthogonal (ie the intergral of the product of the two is zero) and their harmonics can be used as the basis of a transform

      Do you mean the cyclotomic FFT over a finite field or the number theoretic transforms such as Mersenne and Fermat?

      Julie

      Advert
      #787999
      Zephyrin
      Participant
        @zephyrin

        this is a quite interesting thread…

        I use regularly the free software “Audacity “, where a FFT function is implemented, and when recording the soundtrack of my model engines running, it appears that this function gives sometime a simple way to measure the speed of the modelClipboard 1

        #788003
        SillyOldDuffer
        Moderator
          @sillyoldduffer

          Been horribly interrupted and unwell too, so will take a while to absorb this.   My fog is slowly clearing.

          Just as a quicky, Julie explained Windows, thanks.  The difference can be shown fairly easily with GRC, though not why one is better than another!   I’m obliged to Julie for the word ‘filter’.  Like all tools there are ifs and buts. Here’s the same data with different Windows applied:

          BLACKMAN

          blackman

          HAMMING

          hamming

          HANN

          hann

          BLACKMAN-HARRIS

          blackmanHarris

          RECTANGULAR

          rectangular

          KAISER

          kaiser

          FLATTOP

          flattop

          Now, which of these is ‘best’.  Depends on what the display is needed for I think.   For example, FLATTOP tends to merge two peaks, that I want to stand out individually.  KAISER eliminates the noisy skirts.  RECTANGULAR sharpens the peaks.  To my eyeball, BLACKMAN and BLACKMAN-HARRIS look suitable for vibration analysis.

          With my software engineer hat on, the real tool will be implemented by me using an FFT library.  Therefore, I should look for one that supports all the Windowing methods, and allow the user to select the one he likes!

          Also, some of the other display options might be useful, such as constellation:

          constellation

          and waterfall:

          waterfallApart from the visual display, I shall probably have to write code that extracts peaks for statistical purposes.  Which Window is used for that needs more thought.  I have to read the posts again and take notes.  Much to this!

          Thanks Again,

          Dave

           

           

           

           

          #788013
          SillyOldDuffer
          Moderator
            @sillyoldduffer
            On Zephyrin Said:

            this is a quite interesting thread…

            I use regularly the free software “Audacity “, where a FFT function is implemented, and when recording the soundtrack of my model engines running, it appears that this function gives sometime a simple way to measure the speed of the modelClipboard 1

            Yay, like it. Thanks for the report, hadn’t thought of that. Must look for the RPM of my lathe in an audio sample.  And the lead-screw…

            Dave

            #788529
            Julie Ann
            Participant
              @julieann
              On Nigel Graham 2 Said:

              ….“weed the raspberry patch…” Organic computers?

              Sadly not, but I am finally getting a decent crop of raspberries.

              I must be the only person alive who has never used a Raspberry Pi! Although I vaguely knew Jack Lang. He was a cofounder of the company I mentioned above (Topexpress); albeit at the time I joined it was being reorganised and Jack Lang had moved on and invested in another company. Called Perihelion if I remember correctly, which was involved parallel computing – remember the Transputer? Jack Lang lived in the same village as me, albeit on the outskirts.

              The mention of sonar by Nigel is interesting. Topexpress was involved in sonar, both theory and experimental. It is a difficult area from the perspective of signal processing. The velocities being measured are significant compared to the speed of sound in water so Doppler shift is more than just a linear frequency shift. To make things more complicated the speed of sound varies with water temperature and salinity.

              My only involvement with sonar was being asked to design some 8-pole filters with arbitrary pole/zero locations in the complex w-plane, which is the complex conjugate of the more familiar s-plane. I found a paper in the IEE journals that described a second order filter block with arbitrary pole and zero positions. Once I’d worked out that the mathematics in the paper was wrong I derived my own (correct) transfer function. I won’t bore everyone with the filter design, but I did get them working according to the theory.

              Julie

               

            Viewing 5 posts - 51 through 55 (of 55 total)
            • Please log in to reply to this topic. Registering is free and easy using the links on the menu at the top of this page.

            Advert

            Latest Replies

            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)
            Viewing 25 topics - 1 through 25 (of 25 total)

            View full reply list.

            Advert

            Newsletter Sign-up