Been horribly interrupted and unwell too, so will take a while to absorb this. My fog is slowly clearing.
Just as a quicky, Julie explained Windows, thanks. The difference can be shown fairly easily with GRC, though not why one is better than another! I’m obliged to Julie for the word ‘filter’. Like all tools there are ifs and buts. Here’s the same data with different Windows applied:
BLACKMAN

HAMMING

HANN

BLACKMAN-HARRIS

RECTANGULAR

KAISER

FLATTOP

Now, which of these is ‘best’. Depends on what the display is needed for I think. For example, FLATTOP tends to merge two peaks, that I want to stand out individually. KAISER eliminates the noisy skirts. RECTANGULAR sharpens the peaks. To my eyeball, BLACKMAN and BLACKMAN-HARRIS look suitable for vibration analysis.
With my software engineer hat on, the real tool will be implemented by me using an FFT library. Therefore, I should look for one that supports all the Windowing methods, and allow the user to select the one he likes!
Also, some of the other display options might be useful, such as constellation:

and waterfall:
Apart from the visual display, I shall probably have to write code that extracts peaks for statistical purposes. Which Window is used for that needs more thought. I have to read the posts again and take notes. Much to this!
Thanks Again,
Dave