so much for Google Lens
🙁
MichaelG.
try it again, but without “trade mark” text
Didn’t work for me and I removed the dimples to sharpen the edges, thus:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472df/472dfdac6477296c3cc2f7509cad30f058103056" alt="osko"
Chris has the magic touch, finding the logo on a West German entrenching tool.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/472df/472dfdac6477296c3cc2f7509cad30f058103056" alt="SAM_3706"
He was right in #774431 though I missed it!
Definitely West German, pre-unification, because it has a NATO Stock Number (5120-12-1211532) ISO Group’s website doesn’t identify the manufacturer, but another might. Researching ‘SPATEN, MEHRZWECK’ might reveal more too.
Anyway, we now know the trade-mark was current in 1965. Mysterious OSKO was a West German manufacturer of micrometers and military grade shovels and probably much else. Probably disappeared after becoming unprofitable or merging with a larger firm who didn’t use the old name or trade-mark. Dunno.
Judging by the spade in the trade-mark, the firm majored in hand-tools, suggesting micrometers were a side-line. Could be cheap and cheerful or posh.
Be interesting to have TomK’s collection calibrated. He said: ‘All of my micrometers work and can be used and are accurate.‘ But without calibrating them no-one knows how accurate they are! May not matter – a collection of micrometers bought for fun and interest don’t have to be accurate at all.
As Tomk’s collection is a pre-loved mix of micrometers of unknown quality from different sources, there must be inconsistencies due to wear, damage, or cost-cutting manufacture. Accuracy declines with age; it depends on how good the thread was new and on how worn it is now. No micrometer is accurate after being dropped on a concrete floor!
My guess is the collection are all accurate in the ±0.003″ region, with many good to ±0.001″, and a few even better. For ordinary working ±0.003″ accuracy is often ‘good enough’, but not for making exchangeable parts, and unacceptable in a tool-room!
Calibrating micrometers isn’t easy, especially to better than 1 thou. Needs a set of gauge blocks in top condition, ideally calibrated themselves, a temperature controlled room, a magnifying glass, good feel for the instrument, and several meticulous repeat readings of each step across the scale. Lots of tedious averaging and the record keeping has to be strictly honest.
Fortunately I work almost entirely up to the ±0.02mm/1 thou, mostly below, and way below tool-room standards. Most of my measuring is done with a digital caliper and the micrometer only comes out on special occasions. Trusted because it’s new, been mollycoddled, and I checked against a set of parallels. Though the measurements aren’t tenths accurate, the micrometer correctly detects the parallels aren’t quite consistent. My digital calipers all say the parallels are perfect because they aren’t accurate enough to pick up the errors.
Back to tracing OSKO though, I think a German speaker living in Germany is needed.
Dave