Hello:
@Pete:
> … excuse my poor image …
Nah!
> Thanks for taking the time to draw it up.
> … helps you understand …
Yes, now I get what you meant.
> … a pretty simple solution.
Indeed it is and very doable, so to speak.
@Joseph Noci 1:
> … don't think the unimat column could take that …
The column is barely Ø 28mm and I only have ~ 5.5mm aluminium casting to thread something in.
> … sound machining capabilities …
That is available but what may not be available is the time/interest for the shop to do it or do it for a reasonable price.
I have to keep the job as straightforward and simple as possible.
> … as long as the slot is truly inline …
No doubt about that, there's a huge late 1940's Bridgeport mill and an exprerienced chap to do the job.
> … it's a small machine.
Yes it is.
The whole mill with the new (lighter) motor weighs in at ~ 7.50 kg.
I have to go to the machine shop early next week and will take the parts and the sketches.
The diameter of the column, the small amount of material to thread into and the simplicity of the solution has me thinking that Pete and Joseph have made a point so I think I'll go with that.
The cone shaped slot to be made on the column is common to all the solutions which may boil down to how the spindle head gets its register rather than how it gets gripped, which is a function of the screw on the other side.
I was thinking that I will probably need to pressure fit a short external brass tube to accomodate the threads and the reamed hole and have the aluminium casting take that part and nothing else.
Eventually (if needed) the part could be modified/replaced with little effort.
We'll see how this plays out.
Once again, thanks to all who replied.
Best,
JHM