Fits are an example of the sharp divide between amateur and professional machining. The relatively simple methods of our forefathers are well-suited to small workshops and prototype work, hence we can and should work with old-school fits. For this Tubal Cain's Model Engineer's Handbook is excellent. He gives generalised fit information for Shrink, Force, Drive, Wheel Keying, Push and Slide fits, plus dimensions for six other running fits. Shaft/Hole fits are on page 5.18 of my 3rd Edition.
The different fits aren't a fixed reduction or increment; rather the difference between hole and shaft depends on diameter, so a Shrink fit is undersized by 1.5 thou per inch of diameter, while a slide fit is oversized by 0.45 thou per inch diameter.
In my rough workshop I use Tubal Cain as a Guide rather than 'the law', and I suppose most of my efforts are either 'Wheel Keying' (requiring more-or-less light tapping) or something vaguely between a Push and Slide fit I guess many other Model Engineers would put more effort into fitting parts! Normal practice is to cut the hole accurately to size and then to adjust the shaft to fit: there's no need for special reamers.
The professionals are much more scientific due to the needs of interchangeable manufacturing. Their system covers adjusting holes to fit shafts as well as shafts to holes, and is much more complicated. Tubal Cain deals with fits in half a page; this PDF on ISO Dimensions and Tolerances is 39 pages long.
ISO is no problem to a production engineer: if he needs a few thousand unusual reamers, he rings up the supplier and calls them off in bulk. And in bulk, they aren't particularly expensive. No such luck when an amateur wants just one! Small quantities bought new retail are liable to give grandad a heart attack when the bill is presented. So my advice is to buy a copy of Tubal Cain and stick to that!
Dave