Posted by Mike Hurley on 06/05/2022 10:13:05:
May initially seem off-topic, but isn't!
Have read recently that the government are altering the rules about passport expiry dates, which will cause confusion at the passport office – hence creating more delays. A number of commentators have said that this is to deliberately cause these delays and give them an excuse to privatise the whole show. Obviously I can't personally say if this is true or not.
However, if it is, why not do the same with the DVLA? Why not write to your MP and suggest this?
Not sure government would need an excuse if privatisation made sense – most civil service functions have long since been privatised.
Nationalisation and Privatisation are just tools, and neither is always the right answer. Applying them dogmatically often ends badly, and I think applying either for political reasons is unwise.
Privatisation makes sense when a government department performs a function where two or more commercial organisations compete to provide the same function. In theory, Competition keeps prices down and performance high, though in practice many commercial companies fail instead, as we've just seen happen to a shower of Energy Companies. Privatisation doesn't work when the alternative doesn't naturally foster competition. So privatising Her Majesties Stationary Office (supplying pens, paper and office equipment to government) was a success, but privatising the railways by creating an artificial market has caused more trouble than it's worth!
Privatising core government functions like tax collection, the armed forces, roads and the police always fail. Other functions, like prisons, are more blurred, and it's common for them to return in-house after privatisation has failed, often spectacularly!
One advantage of privatisation was it avoided an EU rule restricting government subsidies and spending on stuff governments should steer clear of such as Europe's National Airlines all being expensively kept afloat by subsidies, plus a bunch of no-hope commercial failures in Car, Ship, and Steel making, not to mention Wine Lakes and Butter Mountains!. Privatisation opened the door to other ways of raising money such as the hideously expensive PFI scheme, still paid for by the taxpayer. Presumably, this advantage has gone because European rules no longer apply!
Privatising the Passport Office doesn't seem to offer any advantage to the taxpayer. Undesirable because passports are a core government security function and there's no competition to drive value for money. Privatisation is an advantage to politicians though – lets them off the hook when things goes wrong by making it less clear they are still responsible.
I wouldn't write to my MP recommending Nationalisation or Privatisation because I don't have access to the information needed to make a rational choice. Not a matter of opinion because all the pros and cons have to be carefully considered. In particular, and this applies to the DVLA as well, how exactly will competition be introduced into the system? Recommending privatisation is easy, making it work in the absence of natural competition is hard!
Dave