Posted by Pete Rimmer on 16/01/2022 09:26:42:
As far as the machine is concerned there's no difference between accellerating the spindle to x rpm and decellerating it from x to a stop in the same timeframe. The mechanical loads are the same.
For there to be no difference mechanically the reverse absolutely has to be 'in the same timeframe'. Does the machine guarantee that? Maybe, maybe not.
If the machine is running slowly, as when threading, it's not unreasonable for a reverse to be approximately in the same time-frame, hurrah. But if the same machine is spinning a heavy lump of metal quickly, the reverse definitely isn't in the same time-frame and the amount of kinetic energy stored in the system is sky high: chances are damage will be done.
There's an electrical problem too. Electric motors starting from a stand pull much more than normal current until the rotating armature generates a back-EMF. When the power is reversed on a spinning motor, the back-EMF becomes a negative resistance and an exceptionally large surge current flows. Unless the motor and electrics are rated appropriately, they will get hot, perhaps too hot. Again, the amount of energy in the system and how long it takes to dissipate makes a big difference.
One of the advantages of ex-industrial machines is they are built to take abuse. Hobby machines are more delicate, and their operators have drive them carefully. Unwise for Myford owners to power reverse a lathe fitted with a single-phase motor, screw-on chuck, and weedy Dewhurst. Myford lathes have many virtues, but they're clearly not designed for that operation. Nor are Chinese mini-lathes!
Dave