I’m addressing John Coates’ second question from the start of his thread dated 14/11/2010 – Turning – how to return a RH cut
As a Myford advocate, I bought my ML7 second hand in the early 60’s. As I recall (from the widow who was selling up), the lathe was brand new in c1946. In other words, this was a machine which had been used for about 60 years when I sold up. It served me extremely well in all the time I used it, although I would have preferred a Super 7 based upon my toolroom experiences.
However, I have to say that, because the design of the ML7 saddle did not fully address the Narrow Guide Principle and issues Kinematic, the inevitable off-set forces, particularly those in opposition from the lead-screw and the tool post, eventually caused wear which allowed the saddle to rotate very slightly in the horizontal plane.
This produced two adverse effects. Firstly, it allowed the cross-slide to twitch out of square, and secondly, upon completing an internal pass, it would cause a tool to remove a little more metal if the saddle feed was reversed without first moving the cross-slide forward and cutter (ie. away from the operator and the work piece). The converse was such that the cutter would lift off an external diameter of the work piece rather than leave a spiral as per the experiences of other members.
By the way, the rectification of this lathe’s shortcoming was the feature of an ME article written, as I recall, by the esteemed Mr Radford of NZ back in the 70’s. He machined (milled) the saddle in such a way that both the front and rear guide faces extended over the full `length’ of the saddle.
As for producing a top-notch surface finish, I adopted the so-called `diamond turning’ technique, ie. by stoning a tiny flat in the tip of the cutting tool. This flat would be absolutely parallel with the direction of travel, while being slightly wider than the feed pitch. You can imagine that this would virtually eliminate any evidence the the feed!?
Regards,
Sam