The wonders of AI…

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

I had guessed that much, Paul

… I was just attempting to continue the conversation.

MichaelG.

[Michael GilliganParticipant @michaelgilligan61133]

It does very-much depend upon how one asks the questions, Paul

Please try asking these, in turn

ISO 12181-1 : 2011

 

and what does -2 cover, please

I have only used information of which you were already aware, so it’s not cheating

MichaelG.

[Nigel Graham 2Participant @nigelgraham2]

The lesson would be to use as nearly as possible the original publisher (the ISO in this case), although in many techncial fields that is hindered by sheer cost.

UK organisations like the BSI have presumably been ordered to stand on their own two feet commercially; but have a comparatively limited market of principally, government departments, companies and academic institutions for whom the cost does matter but is comparatively low, even an investment.

It is worse still for scientific journals as many of the leading ones have been taken over by big publishing firms who erect very hard and very costly barriers. These have been known to obstruct even authors trying to read their own papers in the original journals!

I fear a lot of people becoming horribly unstuck by thinking AI magically, automatically all correct all the time. Well, even the brightest humans with RI can make mistakes, so why should AI be any more reliable? Being really a glorified, high-powered filter and text-matcher, if it picks up the wrong stuff or misinterprets the right stuff it can only relay the wrong stuff.

 

If the originator of standards or other technical material is accessible without a mortage, surely that should be the first choice?

[Paul L]

On Paul L Said:

I already knew what the standard was pertaining to.

I asked for the ‘principles and guidlines’ to try and get some more details to save me from purchasing the standard.

 

 

Nigel

Just quoting Pau L verbatim, for clarity ^^^

MichaelG.

.

Edit: __ my earlier post illustrates how little one gets for nowt, from ISO

.

PLEASE just for the purposes of demonstration, Nigel/Paul … try asking the two questions that I did.

[Paul LParticipant @paull58212]

I agree Nigel.

The current AI models only know what they have been taught. ChatGPT 4 (the current public one) stoped its training last July, I believe. Ask it who the 47th president of the USA is…..

AGI is what all these are working toward, some say that could hapen in 10 years others think up to 50  years.One thing is for certain new AI models will change the way we do things in coming times

Edited to add.

GPT 4.0 stopped learning  (training) in Sept. 21,

[Author]

Posts