I wouldn’t buy a lathe with a broken tailstock! Not unless I happened to have a spare in my junk-box, or had the wherewithal to mend it cheap. Mending that kind of break is possible, but has a high-risk of failure.
Buying second-hand, always check condition – very little else matters! Forget brand reputations, and ruthlessly crush any personal tendency to rose-tint the enduring powers of classic machine tools. Ask, ‘how much time and money will it take to get this back into working order, and am I prepared to pay that’? Walk away from scrap.
Not clear if this particular Wade is the Plain or Screw-cutting version. No mention of change gears suggests it’s the cheaper Plain version.
The above suggests this machine is only worth scrap value, but value is always difficult to predict and might be higher than expected. Could be a few folk desperately compete for it as a source of spares so they can restore their old-bangers!
Dave
——————————
Well, my first lathe was a Wade and I bought it with the whole tailstock missing!
It cost me £3-10-0 in about 1955 and I carried it home on the bus. I powered it with my mums treadle sewing machine stand and whilst I never made anything useful I did learn a lot.
The Wade lathe is a bit cruder than it looks, all the castings and working surfaces are aluminium apart from the mandrel bearings and the cross slide working surfaces (ali on ali) are softer than steel swarf and chips, not good scenario.
I ‘loaned’ the lathe to a next door neighbor but he moved house whilst I was away and I never saw it again, by that time I was into cars and had a Unimat SL
Ian P