I assume you are referring to the article in the current issue of MEW (MEW 178).
To my mind, this article is much too brief: it does not give sufficient information, nor does it explain about calibration.
I have used a Halfords 9 Function Cycle Computer, similar to the one in the article, as a cheap rev counter to a) check my fixed lathe speeds; and b) to roughly calibrate my continuously variable milling machine.
My cycle computer can be set to either mph ot kph: I used kph since this gives a higher range of numbers. Furthermore, it has to be set with a particular constant representing the wheel size to which it is connected as the computer converts the pulses into distance and then by means of the internal crystal oscillator, calculates either the mph or kph. In order to get a direct reading of rpm, it is necessary to determine the figure which will give this direct reading: on mine this turns out to be 1667. The computer then gives a kph reading, eg 21.5 which can be taken as 215 rpm.
On my computer, this actually gives a maximum speed (rpm) of 99kph (990 rpm) which is a bit low, however by reducing the constant to 167, the range is multiplied by 10 giving a theoretical maximum of 9900 rpm.
To sum up, these are the ranges on my computer:
Calibration set to 1667.
up to 3.2 kph (32rpm): Too slow for the computer.
3.2kph (32rpm) – 29.9 kph (299rpm): Accurate readings
30kph(300rpm) – 59.5kph (595rpm): Computer rounds to nearest 0.5 kph (5rpm)
60kph (600rpm) – 75kph(750rpm): Computer rounds to nearest 1kph (10rpm)
Above 75kph the display stopped working correctly – obviously too fast! After all, it is a CYCLE computer and any bike travelling at 75kph is……
Reducing the calibration to 167 means that the upper limit theoretically becomes 7500 rpm, but I only managed to test to just over 1000 rpm.
Presumably there is an upper limit due to the time between pulses from the magnet becoming too short. I suppose that using gearing could lengthen this time interval and this extend the range – providing one could accept the rounding to the nearest 5 or 10 rpm.
Although there are limitations with this method, it does work and within those limitations can be quite useful in a rough and ready sense. For my purposes, it was enough to check the lathe (9 fixed speeds) and then to roughly calibrate the milling machine control knob.
Regards,
Peter G. Shaw