Just read this thread with interest, since I have several acres of land mostly used as a 'garden', and several areas are only accessible with a 'strimmer'. I have gone the allegedly 'quality' route (Stihl, Husqvarna, etc) over several years, and am of the opinion it is a total waste of money – either they are the same machine as the much cheaper machines one can buy (and appear so visually), or they are equally as questionable.
I ended up with the cheapest machine with the largest engine (usually 49cc) I can find, because none (including the expensive 'quality' machines) have lasted longer than three years, so buy the cheapest and junk it when it fails has worked best for me.
I have also experimented with different heads – as noted by someone else, nylon cord is sometimes a problem in long grass due to tangling. If you can find square section cord it works slightly better. I have found the solid metal blades (3 or 4 blades) fine for doing the job, especially brush-cutting, but don't do the works of the machine any good – many machines have a flexible drive shaft (looks like a large version of the old speedo drive cables) – guaranteed to shear off eventually – and you try to buy replacements. The versions with solid drive shafts are better, but I have ended up with the squared off drive section just rounding off and spinning in its coupling. If you are cutting heavy growth, it is difficult to be sure you won't hit anything which can stop the blade dead – and bye-bye drive shaft.
The best head I have come across looks like a disk or hexagon with 6 small toothed blades pivotted round its rim. these seem to deal with most things, even hitting the occasional rock, but they will also shred normal boots – beware. The teeth in the blades apparently catch on the grass and shear it off, rather than slide off it. I once made one from thick steel, with short pieces from a log-saw blade attached round the edge – it worked fine, except it was difficult to drill holes in the log-saw blade.
There is also mention of fuel stabilizer – sounds like another con trick to me – I traced the gumminess in my engines to the fact that the engine was left with the residue of the two-stroke mix in it – the petrol evaporated, and left the oil to set in the engine – I had to dismantle several and remove the solidly gummed piston ring (sometimes unsuccessful, breaking the ring in the process). Since then, when I have finished, I drain the petrol, run the engine until it stops, then flush it with clean (non-two stroke) petrol through the spark-plug hole – and never had the problem since I started doing it.
The other repetitive problem I have had is failed spark-plugs – I have no idea how long these are supposed to run – my estimate is about 8 to 10 hours. I have lost count of the number of times a dead machine was traced to 'weak sparks', eventually proved to be a dead spark plug – manufacturer seems irrelevant.