Posted by Hopper on 22/11/2022 09:07:34:
Posted by not done it yet on 22/11/2022 08:46:44:
Posted by John Haine on 22/11/2022 08:40:34:
…
…
A lot of the low cost Chinese chucks seem to be steel bodies. I haven't seen a hardened one yet. Must be cheaper or easier for them to use steel than the traditional cast iron. Cast iron would have the advantages of damping vibration better and resisting distortion under compression better and a better bearing surface where the jaws slide but steel seems to work ok for hobby purposes.
…
Times change! For most of the 19th century, cast-iron was cheap and steel expensive. Neither material was made to a specification, so what you got depended on geography and the skill of the producer. Geography mattered because ore contained impurities that altered the qualities of the metal. At first no-one knew what the impurities were or how they effected alloys, or how to manage them. Cast-iron isn't fussy for many applications: all that's necessary is that it melt and pour without serious flaws. Steel is much more difficult because small quantities of elements like Sulphur, Phosphorous, Nitrogen, Manganese, Nickel and Vandadium alter steel's properties radically. A tiny amount of sulphur makes steel easier to machine, but very slightly more weakens. embrittles, and makes it impossible to harden.
In the good old days it was cheaper and easier to make chucks out of cast-iron; castings are simple to machine and the metal absorbs a useful amount of vibration. Unfortunately cast-iron being weak in tension makes them likely to burst. Big chucks, anything above about 5", must be spun within their rating, and it's unwise to spin small ancient cast-iron chucks at high-speed on a modern lathe. Bursting chucks were quite common in industry before WW2, but I've never heard of it happening in a home workshop. However, an ancient chuck made for a treadle-lathe, might be dangerous at 3000rpm.
Gradually during the early 20th century, steel became the preferred metal for 'quality' chucks. Although steel was more expensive, and harder to machine, and more prone to ring, the resulting chuck could be run at much higher speeds. As ever higher cutting speeds are essential in cut-throat manufacturing, steel chucks have tended to supplant cast-iron.
Interestingly, improvements in steel manufacture mean steel today is about 40% cheaper than cast-iron. Part of that is modern cast-iron being tightly specified, but the situation is confused by many small foundries melting whatever comes to hand to make non-critical items like street furniture. Scrap cast-iron can be anything between aero-space and horrible carp!
It's not as simple as 'steel being suitable for hobby purposes', though I suspect there's a cross-over point where the advantage switches between cast-iron and steel. The deadening property of cast-iron helps reduce vibration, a feature worth having on smallish machines that don't run at high speed. But today, that means making the chuck from a high-end cast-iron and testing it carefully at speed, pushing the price up. Steel doesn't have a bursting problem and although machining is a little more expensive, the metal is cheaper. It might also be more economic for a bog standard chuck maker to rationalise production by making steel only, because steel chucks are 'OK' for most purposes.
Dave