Using Harris's formula I get 1.0mm for a 105mm tube at 60psi but gut instink tells me 2 – 2.5mm would be better
60×4.15 / 2×3125 x 100 / 95
249 / 6250 x 1.052 = 0.042" = 1mm
Some notes on your post above
I notice you are using a higher UTS than harris and you have a 10times larger UTS for 120, surely that should be less 3800 would be nearer the mark
You have got the results for 60psi and 120psi around the wrong way in the first paragraph
Using John Hainings formula I get 0.070" or 1.8mm
J
Edited By JasonB on 09/12/2012 08:20:17