Clearance of .003" on an unlubricated valve stem could quite possibly be too tight, I reckon. My 1977 Harley with cast iron heads has a factory spec of .0035 to .0045" valve stem clearance, new from the factory. Then they allow another 2 thou of wear beyond that before replacement is called for. And that is in a much more modern engine with higher revs, enclosed rocker gear and pressure fed oil to the rocker spindles and arms which then sprays out over the guides and valve stems.
So I reckon you could try something like .005" clearance and see how it goes. Maybe even a thou more. Just make sure they give the valve stem a darn good polish up after it has nipped up so there is no roughness left to start galling again.
I don't know if the chrome is really visible on stainless Harley valve stems, I never really looked at them that hard. What brand of valve did you use? I think most of the high performance aftermarket valves like Manley come with chrome stems if they are stainless. But they are made for high rpm high power use with heavy valve springs etc so your lovely olde-worlde single banger will probably not need it.
It is a common problem with modern machine shops working on true vintage machinery. They think that because they have done work on Honda 4s and Kawa 900s from the 1970s, and maybe a few old Norton Commandos or BSA twins and the like, that they know all about "vintage" bikes. But those old engines from the pre-War era ran everything loose and are a whole different world again. They were still operating very much in the steam age to a certain extent . They did not have the machining or the metallurgy let alone the lubrication, to run modern tight clearances.
Edited By Hopper on 18/02/2023 04:17:31
Edited By Hopper on 18/02/2023 04:29:00