Dave,
Amazingly, in our little coastal town here, we have the tubing you are after! In 12mm and 20mm diameters – It is used extensively now, it seems, in plumbing all new house builds, But that does not really help you, I guess! Seems around 80p per meter for the 12mm pipe.
As for brains, not sure …I just dig and persevere till I think I know what I need to know and get on with it!
A bit of the piping topic, but likewise, I have a very poor HF location. Although I am 40 or so meters from the edge of the ocean, with a clean HF view to the west, My east north and south is a noisy nightmare – lots of power line RF control of geysers , and that stuff is trash – lots if RFI and I have an ongoing fight with the local council and our Radio Regulatory institution ( CRAN) for the last 4 years – getting nowhere fast.
So I tried some other ideas, which may interest you – I built this noise canceller device ( you may be able to purchase one in the UK?) –
**LINK**
**LINK**
I always regarded this sort of device with suspicion but this one really worked well for me – it did really reduce my ambient noise by a good 3 to 4 S points!
Basically takes an ambient RF sample from its own small wire antenna and adds that to the signal from the main antenna ( your loop..) in a manipulated manner – phase shifts it in relation to the main signal, so that there is cancellation. You move the sampler antenna around till you get the best cancellation, while also fiddling with the phasing controls. Takes a little while of mucking about, but the results are well worth it!
With respect to a loop with joints – you lose nothing by using 20mm copper tubing, with the 45deg elbows, and solder the joints properly. The current flow in a loop antenna on transmit is very high, and due to the skin effect, resistance of the antenna plays a big roll – clean copper wins hands down against clean aluminium, but any oxidation on either can reduce the efficiency from 3 or 4% to 1-2%…
Also, the 'diameter' increase needed to enclose the same circle area by using an octagon shape is very small and will not impact the size in any detrimental manner I would think.
The Al piping may fair better in that the Al material is kept from oxidising by the plastic covering – I scrubbed my copper loop with pot scouring pads and then gave the loop a coat of clear two-part epoxy paint. That survived around 8 years.
The vane capacitor was enclosed in a box made from 5mm PVC sheet, and all pipe exits were sealed with silicone. The tuning of that cap was done by means of an RC servo, with a simple RC servo tester providing the 1ms to 2ms pulse train. Tuning was effected by watching the SWR meter and tuning for lowest SWR. You can a also tune on maximum received noise, but I had such a crappy ( digital) servo in the beginning , it generated so much noise itself that it masked the signal! When I replaced it with an old analogue servo that method worked ok.
Dave, I have one of those COMET vacumm capacitors still – good for 10KV, I believe – Had it for 12 years or so and will never use it – I could try get it to you? Not sure how much shipping would be and what the complexities are at your end for its import? It is about 220mm long and 90mm diameter, maybe 1kg or so. Solves some of the issues of keeping it dry, etc..Even a study plastic bag and tie wraps would work! You are welcome to it..
Regarding the band you are working – Generally a minimum loop diameter of 1.2 to 1.5m is recommended to cover 5MHz to 16MHz with 'some' usable transmit efficiency, and a diameter of 2 to 2.2m for 3MHz to 8MHz.
The smaller the diameter the greater the capacitance has to be to tune the lower bands, the higher the loop current and the greater the loop end voltage the cap has to withstand. A 1m diameter loop at 3.5MHz may need around 400pf ( depends on many things, pipe diameter, material, etc) and the cap would see around 15KV at 100 watts drive…A 2.5m loop would drop that voltage to around 8KV – please note, these are severe generalisations, but the variance in voltage due to loop diameter is what matters, not the actual value.
I eventually gave up with loops – I found no advantage over a simple inverted V, other than the neat ability to be able to rotate the loop to null out an interfering signal. Although I must say that the loop was a little quieter since it is a magnetic receptor and does not really respond to the electrical portion of a radio wave, which is what most mane-made interference consists off! But generally the loop was 1 to 2 S points down on the inverted V..
I am interested to understand your 'broad band' statement for loops – Loops are inherently VERY narrow band – a few percent at best, and tune very sharply – any broad bandness is a sure sign of big losses, ie, approaching a dummy load rather than an antenna!
Forgive my (long) topic drift, but I suspect it is in line with what you are doing anyway!
Joe