Posted by Roderick Jenkins on 28/03/2023 20:45:44:
Quite right Duncan. I expect SOD to correct the record at the earliest opportunity
Rod
I plead 'not guilty' this time!
My Oxford English Dictionary dates first use of 'case-harden' in print to 1677 (which date is repeated in the Wikipedia article). Though iron-workers didn't know it at the time, the surface was hardened by carburisation, i.e encouraging carbon to diffuse into an Iron surface by heating the two in contact at about 2000°C for quite a long time.
Furnace fires are filthy. Carburisation occurs along with a lot of other undesirable chemistry that makes results unpredictable. Therefore a case was used to protect the job and the chemicals from corruption.
The case could be clay, but cast-iron became popular (because it's cheap), Wrought iron was recommended because it lasted longer, and Nichrome is used for precision hardening.
The original mix was sliced leather (a source of clean carbon), and it was soon discovered adding horn made it work more reliably. The horn provided Nitrogen. This combination is still recommended one of my books dating to about 1930, though they suggest buying a commercially consistent bagful rather than making your own. By 1948, chemical mixtures are recommended: charcoal and Potassium Ferricyanide and/or Barium Carbonate. In 1948 Barium Carbonate was preferred, I don't know if that's still true.
Technology marches on. An actual protective case was essential when furnaces were no more sophisticated than a heap of dubious fuel and a bellows. When clean heat became available and the science was understood, the need for a separate protective case diminished – in effect the furnace is the case!
As the original 'case-hardening' slid towards meaning 'any skin hardening process', it became necessary to invent new terms to cover several hardening processes; for example 'Pack Hardening' is now used to describe the original process using a sealed box.
English constantly shifts, and mechanical engineering might be worse than most. The year I left school, they threw out their collection of old technology text-books, and we were allowed to take our pick. Interesting because what boys were taught in 1933, had changed markedly by 1945, 1954 was different from both, and my 1960's learning had moved on again. In 1933 much attention paid to heat (steam), and optics (fresnel lighthouses), but no mention of atomic structure. 1960's no mention of steam engines, or light-houses, large chunks of old-fashioned chemical analysis had disappeared, replaced by orbitals, electrons, and physical chemistry. My children's textbooks were different again. The underlying science is much the same, but the emphasis is different. All that effort I put into learning how to make coal-gas and recover a multitude of useful organic chemicals by roasting coals was wasted! No surprise that the language we use varies over time. Best not to die in a ditch over it!
Choo-choos process is aimed at small workshops. It's conveniently easy rather than top-notch, producing an unpredictably thin hard layer. No box needed because it relies on a source of clean heat such as a blowlamp, and melting chemicals in the mix keep air out for long enough to get a reasonable result. Not to be compared with industrial hardening, where a thick layer of known depth is required, and the finished item has to meet a hardness specification. Choo-choo's mild-steel screwdriver will perform better after simple hardening, but it won't be anything like as hard wearing as a commercial screwdriver. An excellent learning opportunity rather than the best of all possible ways to make a screwdriver!
Dave