Posted by Martin Kyte on 06/07/2021 09:53:45:
Why do we even think that rail workers are on ridiculously high wages …
regards Martin
Early in my career I noticed my job was difficult, skilled, and grossly underpaid whilst everyone else was paid enormous money to do trivial work. In fact, everyone apart from me was overpaid, thick, lazy and underperforming! Later, having done a few different jobs, and studied many others, I realised you have to walk a mile in the other guys shoes before jumping to conclusions!
Are train drivers comparatively overpaid due to powerful unions? How about members of the House of Lords, paid £350 per day to attend, no work required, subsidised bars and restaurants, plus free parking in central London? Actually, you always have to look closer. As jobs, Train driving and the even more glamorous equivalent of Airline Pilot had no attraction to me because they disrupt family life. And although the House of Lords sounds as if it's full of idle aristocrats, it's actually made up of retired big-hitters who often improve shoddy legislation emerging from the Commons.
There's no automatic connection between skill and pay-rates. Skills have be relevant and in demand, not just impressive. Not much call in the UK for coal miners, dBase III programmers, ostlers, typist or gladiators. My mum was a comptometer operator, and a codebreaking aunt selected cryptographically promising messages for input to Colossus at Bletchley. In their day, all highly valuable jobs, not now.
A good radio programme a few months back discussed the downfall of British Leyland. The company was formed as a last ditch government attempt to save the British owned Car industry. Government forced failing companies to merge by refusing to subsidise them individually. The idea was to promote economies of scale and enable modernisation. Unfortunately almost all the companies were financial basket cases resulting from low productivity due to out-dated machines and methods, failure to invest, high staff costs, lack of imagination, and decades of poor labour relations. In order to maintain production using old-fashioned hard-work methods dating back to when labour was cheap, BL had to pay top rates for staff because people could get decent pay for easier work elsewhere. And Unions with long memories of previous exploitation were happy to exploit the situation, demanding more money in compensation for poor working conditions as if there were no tomorrow. Eventually unskilled assembly line workers were paid more than toolmakers, designers, and managers, which led to more discontent and throttled the improvement programme. Despite strong attempts to put things right it's no surprise the company collapsed. Skilled staff and government cash aren't enough when history leaves a business haemorrhaging money.
Economic productivity is more important than skills. The whole has to be balanced. Skills are only one of several means to an end, and they may be worthless.
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 06/07/2021 12:02:58