At the smaller, more economical, Model Engineer affordable end of the range the quality of the carbide can be very variable. Seems to be some element of "whatever we can get this week" in the suppliers production plans. Certainly no active, focused, material development aimed at small lathe applications. As ever the problem with carbide is that its admirable strength and durability when kept under decent compressive loading is counterbalanced by fragility if it ever gets into tension. The Sandvick "Why Climb Mill" paper which Neil very kindly linked to in another thread makes it clear that even today clearing the very fine exit end of the chip when normal milling can rapidly blunt cutters seriously reducing life. Hmmn. Fine chip. Short life. Sounds about where Brian came in.
Of course the absolute sharpness that can be got on a cutting edge is heavily dependant on umpteen parameters like grain size, bonding and gawd knows what else. Its fairly clear that as you approach the ultimate possible sharpness there is is pretty much nothing holding the carbide grains on. Which obviously sets the limit to how sharp a usefully durable cutter can be before the edge crumbles away. Our smaller machines inevitably suffer more from vibration, minor deflection, speed instability etc than industrial types which clearly won't help as every vibe, however small, puts a tension load into the cutter. Worse for really tiny cuts as there is pretty much nothing to load up and stabilise things.
Worth examining your methods to see if you can get good finish from deeper cuts. If I go below 0.5 mm (20 thou) its 'cos I've cocked up in measurement, tool grind or material selection (must stop buying from Crap But Cheap Metals Inc). Generally 50 thou, 1mm (ish) cuts for pretty much every job works OK for me giving a reasonable balance between finish, cutting time and chip handing. I rarely need to remove so much stock that the extra two or three passes at 1 mm compared to really exploiting the machine capacity are significant.
Clive