An X3 is a 600w DC brushed motor machine with a belt and gear combination drive.
A Super X3 – SX3 in short is 1000w brushless motor machine with a belt drive.
The brushed motor on the X3 hangs on the outside of the machine. If you have a cold and/or damp workshop, the early models of the X3 used to get effected, especially if machines were left un-used. This problem is not unique to this machine. I am no electronics expert. All I know is that warmer workshops, combined with starting the machine at slow speed for such motors, to warm them up, before use in a cold workshop, or if the machine has not been used for a long time, could help in avoiding damaging circuit boards. After the first two/three years of manufacture of X3, the newer brushed motors on the X3 have proved to be more stable if machines were not used. However, the principal as stated still applies to almost ALL hobby class brushed DC motor based machines from China. Concept: ‘Use them or lose them’.
Why a fault in the motor could take out component on a circuit board, again i have no idea. Perhaps Les can comment on this. He is one of the people on this forum who does have extensive knowledge of the original X3 board.
Now, coming onto the SX3. This has a 1000w brushless motor, which is a totally different animal. It is enclosed inside the head. In the early days, this machine had issues with torque due to the incorrect programming on the related control board. ARC only started selling the SX3 after the torque issue was addressed. All of this is well documents across forums. It is quiet because of the belt drive, and in terms of torque, in ARCs opinion, it is capable of successfully taking on any machine in this size/capacity.
When comparing, you need to compare with other hobby machines in this size, gear or belt drive. In terms of torque, the 1000w brushless SX3 will challenge a 1200w to 1300w brushed DC machine in this class – with or without belt drive, and ARC is happy to make this non-bullcrap statement. I don’t know if it can take on the three phase motor with inverter new offerings on the market by a competitor, but in terms of torque across the speed range – low through to high, I am quietly confidant that it will, and it is at a cheaper price.
Why Daz has been unlucky on two occasions with his Axminster SX3 – I don’t know. I stand by my statement that the brushless motor with related control board is very much a robust system. When we first started selling the machine, SIEG told me that it is suitable for light industrial use, in other words – semi-continous use. Visitors to our website, as well as industrial users who have bought this machine from us over the years, are very well aware that we only sold this machine for hobby use, until middle of last year – 2014. Also, when we sold the SX3 to industrial/business users, we sold it without warranty or guarantee – totally within the law before anyone decides to challenge this comment – as it was sold for hobby use only. We only revised our statement for this machine to hobby and light-industrial use later last year, after observing the performance of the machine through sales and service/electrical compost low failure over nearly four years.
We have not changed the statement from hobby to light-industrial for any other machine which we sell. The key reason is, industrial users buy the hobby machines as a cheap solution. Some of them understand the limitations, and some don’t. Many of them have years of experience and they also have bridgeports on their asset register, but they don’t compare an SX3 to a Bridgeport. I am not having a go at Daz here, so Daz please don’t feel offended
As I said earlier, I don’t know why Daz has been unlucky with his Axminster SX3. It is generally not so sensitive. In fact, this system is far more superior in terms of electronics then most in this size. Daz can call and discuss with me on Monday if he wants to.
Happy New Year
Edited By JasonB on 01/01/2015 13:09:03