Hi Chris,
Yes several people were left with substantial damage. Entire classes succumbing to fumes in the short term, had to be moved out of rooms where the fumes were being pumped out of one studio and into the fresh air intake of some classrooms. As you say not everyone is affected in the same way. In the US, there were a large number of successful lawsuits against petroleum companies and educational institutions. In Canada, (don’t know about UK regulations) a lot of people were left destitute; they can’t work at a steady job, disability payments are difficult to get, unless one is missing the odd head and they can’t contribute to pension schemes, so they don’t get a federal pension worth mentioning.
A number of lawsuits were initiated in Canada, but none made it through the system.
This Canadian university made a deal with the Worker’s Compensation Board to designate all students at the university as “employees”. Under the provincial legislation, employees cannot take legal action against an employer when covered but must claim through the provincial WCB.
The WCB was set up basically to prevent payments to workers if at all possible. Managers were given bonuses for how much cash they saved by cheating injured workers. A lot of noise started enquiries, but I doubt that it has changed.
There is an organization in New York who advocate for safety in the arts, but it’s uphill and they can only act for people in the US. They can be very helpful in identifying problem situations though.
The health and safety crowd are a nuisance, usually over the top, so most people tend to not take them seriously. If they were more sensible in their approach, then we may take notice of them. I reckon that more people are injured because of too much safety legislation than would be with more rational approach.
Ian