Posted by Howard Lewis on 03/10/2018 22:54:20:
S O D.
The date on a can is meaningless, other than to persuade you to discard good food, and buy more.
If a can is blown, it IS unsafe. Otherwise the contents are quite eatable. (The contents were sealed having been heated to cook and to kill bacteria)
You would be horrified at how many "out of date" food items my wife and I have consumed without any ill effect, over the many years of our marriage. We've had more problems with supposedly fresh items!
Many years after Shackleton's expedition, someone brought back one of the tins from their supplies. The College lecturer opened the can in the morning, and put the contents onto a plate. When he returned after lunch, the plate had vanished. the lab assistant said "I thought that you had put out for my lunch"
As I keep saying, "Common Sense is no longer that common".
Howard
I'm not a great believer in 'Common Sense' myself – it's difficult to separate it from folklore, prejudice, beliefs, and generalisations. I prefer evidence every time.
In the context of billions of people eating food from billions of cans the experience of two people doesn't count for much – you need to look at population statistics. Good news – the statistics confirm eating canned food is very safe.
However, the purpose of canning food is to extend it's shelf-life, and the length of the extension depends on the contents and how it was prepared. The extension isn't indefinite and there is no universal rule. Milk is much less stable than Chutney. Whatever, it is nothing lasts for ever, though some foodstuffs try hard!
Unfortunately, common sense tells you nothing about the nature of any activity inside the can. Most bacteria are harmless, which is why 'common sense' rarely results in catastrophe. But, a few bacteria excrete vicious toxins, and others are dangerous pathogens. Some produce gas that blows the can, others don't. It's all about risk. The odds are much better than Russian Roulette, but every time you eat food past it's use-by date, you're taking a risk. Might be OK, might not. The longer past the use by date, the more likely something will bite. If you're a tough old bird, you might shrug off the ill-effects. Well done you. But what about the rest of us?
It's unlikely that dates on cans are an international commercial conspiracy designed to make me replace food unnecessarily, but I do understand that undated cans would make life more dangerous for babies, those already ill, and elderly persons in poor heath. To me, it's common sense to reduce the risk by dating the can, and I want to be free to make an informed choice. Not dating perishable goods is unhelpful and perhaps irresponsible. Of course anyone who believes the date is a confidence trick is free to ignore it.
A logic problem with Howard's rejection of Use by Dates is it requires him to put his frail mother into an old-folks home knowing the kitchen routinely uses time-expired canned food to save money!
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 04/10/2018 09:48:34