In his short novel “Strike While the Iron is Hot” Guy Lautard describes a process for ironing out a dent in a hydraulic cylinder using a short slug of steel having a cone shaped end with a flat machined on it. The slug is welded to a T handle which one protagonist turns whilst the other taps the dented cylinder with a hammer. The process was said to take about 20 minutes or so.
I imagine there is some skill involved in how hard to tap and how hard to twist. Its implied that the dent was taken out a bit at a time. The initial insertion being only so far as resistance is felt with the flat aligned with the dent.
In the story the cylinder is 3″ internal diameter with a half inch deep dent in it. The plug was made 4″ long sized to be a nice sliding fit. The line drawing interrupting the text implies that the flat is approaching 3/4 of the diameter of the plug wide. Which all seems way too deep a dent and way to wide a flat to me. Putting a half inch deep dent in a 3″ hydraulic cylinder without bending it beyond repair sounds less than likely. Allegedly a section of I beam had fallen against it on a construction job.
But Lautard is known to be generally reliable writer. So what do I know.
I’d have no compunctions about trying the ideas on a dent about half the relative size.
The general theory is of course very similar to panel beating where you bonk the depression and push out from the back rather than trying to beat the ‘ump back down.
Pushing a ball through something a stiff as stainless steel seems to have high risk of inducing corrugations in front of the dents. Such dent formation basically involves circumferential stress and distortion so rectification is probably best done in the same direction. As the twist a plug’n tap method does. Pushing a ball through is trying to pull the dent out with longitudinal force so you aren’t operating directly on it. Which doesn’t sound the best way.
As ever with stainless steel you will have work hardening to contend with.
Clive