I have long suspected that there is a subtle relationship between internal air pressure variation and oil can leak propensity.
It would seem logical that if the air pressure in the can and pump inlet delivery system can be maintained slightly below atmospheric during operation any oil attempting to leak past seals, joints et al will tend to be drawn back into the can. If final pressure equalisation after use were via the delivery spout that would tend to clear any remaining oil.
The main leaks from mine when resting are from the spouts. Oil seems to creep up rather than drop back. Possibly because the spouts are simple transparent plastic tube with a wire stiffener inside so they hold any bend. Wire in tube is a known way of encouraging capillary flow.
The $64,000 question is how to affordably provide such pressure control without upsetting priming, suction into the pump and oil delivery.
It seems relatively easy to make a system that requires priming after each delivery pump but that would be incredibly irritating to use. The common chemical lab wash bottle is an excellent, cheap, example of such a system. Squeezing the bottle pumps the fluid up through the nozzle. Releasing it draws air back through the nozzle clearing the tube preventing leaks. Possibly something clever could be done with a double acting pump.
The Reilang patent linked to by Michael G seems to make reference to venting arrangements contributing to such pressure control.
I imagine the reported variations in leak performance are primarily due to small variations in insufficiently controlled dimensions leading to different air and oil leak path resistance leading to a different pressure variation profile.
One things for sure any pump oil can leak free by design needs the pump unit completely sealed from the can save for the suction pipe. If its going to be leak free regardless of spindle orientation it will also need a positive tap or screw down seal on the can vent. A simple spring seal won't be enough. Devices of this style have been made for other purposes. The one I encountered was for military purposes. The price tag was significantly more impressive that the (excellent) performance!
Clive