Last week, I ordered two new cartridges (HP 45 & HP 78) for my HP Deskjet 6122 printer. After looking on my usual site, and failing to find them, I ended up on Amazon, and duly placed the order. Later that day, one of the associated firms, telephoned me to say that they were out of stock of the HP colour cartridge, so would I accept two after market cartidges. They then went on to explain that HP had stopped making cartridges for printers over 10 years old which perhaps explains my earlier difficulties. Of course I agreed, and no, I can't comment on the substitutes as they have gone into stock.
However, many years ago I had a HP 880C printer, and tried after market cartridges. It was a total failure. Going back to HP originals, and the printer worked fine. Hence, ever since I have been distinctly leary about after market stuff, but felt I had little option in the current situation. So, I now have a fully functioning printer, for which I can no longer obtain OEM cartridges. Is that right given the coming emphasis on repairability etc?
In a similar manner, I have had computers which whenever Microsoft have updated their OS, have run slower and slower until they became more or less unusable, and hence have been scrapped. Is that right? Personally, I have a deep objection to being forced by the likes of Microsoft to scrap otherwise fully working equipment: in part, this was why I changed to Linux on the demise of XP.
In a similar manner, a few years ago, I was forced into buying a new TV. Why? Well, my original set-top adaptor failed, so I bought a replacement – only to find that it would not work correctly with my 25 year old Mitsubishi 4:3 screen ratio TV. Since then I have bought another DVD recorder, only to find that it too does not work correctly with my 6 year old Samsung TV. Ok, it's usable, but why, why, cannot the manufacturers ensure that these new devices are fully compatible with slightly older equipment.
If the equipment is faulty, broken, or just plain worn out, then that's fair enough, but to be forced to change something just because manufacturers won't support it, or provide necessary software updates seems wrong to me. Yes, I'm well aware of the costs incurred, but given all the broohaha over the usage of oil, then perhaps we, or rather the manufacturers, need to think again.
Regards,
Peter G. Shaw