I have bought and used RP parts from all known RP processes in industry for the past 20 years. (yes, they have been around that long). The first stereolithography parts we bought from a service bureau were extremely fragile and cost multiple thousands of dollars for a part the size of a computer mouse.
Some common processes available from service bureaus today, for your googling pleasure:
SLA -stereolithography (the "original" RP process)
SLS – selective laser sintering
FDM – fused deposition modeling
Objet -resin-jet printing
LOM – laminated object manufacturing
LMS or DMS – laser / direct metal sintering (EOS is one prominent machine maker in this field – makes very usable high strength metal parts)
Two excellent service bureas in USA for RP processes are Solid Concepts and Quickparts.
Today there are many processes for RP and some make fairly durable resin/plastic parts, ie FDM which is similar to the RepRap machine's method. SLS parts are similar in strength to low strength nylon. However what no one talks about is how durable or usable these parts are, especially from home use machines, and how their properties vary from moulded plastic or cast resin parts. Bottom line is they are only about 20-30% of the strength and durability of moulded or cast parts due to the low bond strength of the fused strings or sintered particles comprising the parts. They are fine for making proof of concept models for limited testing, but not suitable for usable products of normal durability.
The other issue is cost of materials. For engineering grade resins for use in FDM machines the cost is staggering, at least ten times the cost of moulding grades of the same resins. Many of these machines use large quantities of a "support" resin to make form-in-place supports under cantilevered areas of the part as the parts are built. Many FDM machines have inefficient support generation programs and use far more support resin than actual part build resin. This is wasteful, expensive, and removing the support resin takes a lot of time. Parts are frequently damaged during support removal. Of course one of the FDM companies' main revenue streams is the sale of these resins, so it is in their interest for users to buy LOTS of it. Thus the support generation programming has not changed for many years.
Until the strength and cost issues can be improved, home manufacturing of parts for everyday articles will likely not become a widespread thing. It is a great model, hobby and educational tool though. It could eventually be prevalent in homes. It really is at the same stage right now as the very first home computers were in the early 1980's.
JD
Edited By Jeff Dayman on 12/07/2013 13:05:09
Edited By Jeff Dayman on 12/07/2013 13:06:18
Edited By Jeff Dayman on 12/07/2013 13:07:11