Posted by Circlip on 06/03/2022 11:02:30:
Dave, can safely affirm that all 365 series DMUs supplied by Leyland Bus were so fitted and the 465 series similar as far back as the early 80s. …
I believe you Ian! I was really pointing to the time it took to roll out improvements across the whole of the UK. I used to travel a lot by train between London and Temple Meads and the track at Bristol featured plenty of pre-loved toilet paper, yuk!
I almost always went by IC125 and suspect they didn't dump sewage. But there was plenty of older rolling-stock in use, especially going North – South. It disappeared slowly. Not sure how long it took Southern Region to modernise, but I was startled by the poor state of their antique rolling-stock on a trip to Chatham : they appeared to be about 50 years behind Western Region! And Western Region weren't perfect, I remember coming home in a train put together after a breakdown. Worn-out carriages where most of the lights and the heating were broken pulled by an ordinary diesel, max speed about 40mph, probably because they didn't trust the brakes!
My friends who worked for the GPO had similar stories: fixing everything from state of the art electronic telephone exchanges to obsolete stuff installed in the 1930s! Huge variations. For about 15 years some engineers had to cope with gear so modern they didn't understand it and gear so old there were no spares or replacements. Others saw a sensible series of upgrades. Taken as a whole, amazing it worked. Sadly, most engineers were made redundant as the system became thoroughly modernised.
I think mixing old and new was true of many organisations. "Squeezing the assets" featured much in my computer career because paying people to expensively maintain old junk came from a different budget. Money for new equipment was first to be cut when times were hard, even though it wasted money in the end. Same reason that had me pouring money into unreliable old bangers rather than saving for a new one: I couldn't raise the capital.
Dave