Posted by Nick_G on 09/02/2017 17:59:36:
.it's a valuable ref point and would look as ugly as naked fat bird sat on a stool. – It would also chip and wear off quicker than you can cook a pancake making it look even worse.
Nick
Ah well, you never know Nick. Some of us may be quite partial to that.
I used to use a leather faced, and copper mallet to knock the cam-lock chucks off the big boy lathes onto a wooden cradle. I guess with the size of it and the rather seizing fit that took hold on the recess, you could say unless you were the hulk it was totally necessary to hit the chuck in order to do the job. In that case, no question it would chip.
But for the more dainty chucks, what situation occurs, other than handling, where you need to smack your chuck? Unless you're hitting it under power, which is obviously bad practice. Is there any reason why it should be damaged provided you're using it properly. There is the chuck key that could cause wear but unless you have a really bad aim, you wont be hitting the chuck body.
I would agree, this certainly warrants a better quality of paint than your regular brands, but I think it could look good if you used a hard wearing glassy coat of enamel.
I say again, is a rusting surface, shouldn't be struck(provided you aren't covered under the aforementioned handling and fitting procedures of big lathes), It could look good? Theres potential reasoning there, I give it that much.
Michael W