One of my favourite hobby-horses is criticising the trust folk have in Trade and Brand names, which just labels with no solid connection to who owns the company, where the product is made, what it's made of, or a specification.
Brands often build a star reputation by performing better than the competition due to a temporary technical advantage only to find other producers catch up later and pinch all the profits. In the rough and tumble of commerce, very often all that's left of a once successful company is the brand – everything else good about them is long gone. Brands are often bought from the receiver so their reputation can be used to boost sales of less satisfactory products, perhaps nothing to do with the original product.
But it seems consumers want to believe in brand-names despite their unreliable history. In this example, it seems consumers have assumed lower-case 'pyrex' is the same as mixed case 'Pyrex' and that both must be made of borosilicate glass. Nope! There's no particular reason why they should.
Buying anything, I suggest looking beyond the brand-name, ideally finding a specification and what the current reputation is. Reputations go up as well as down, and the best available at the moment may be a newcomer, or a tarnished name back on the up.
Buying cookware, better I think to look for 'borosilicate', which is a real material, rather a trade-name which could be mere advertising. There is plenty of borosilicate cookware on the market.
No idea what the pros and cons of using tempered glass to make oven-ware are, though it's a useful material for other purposes. Might not be a dodgy as it's presented. Michael's class-action document is interesting, but doesn't quote many real-life examples. I'd expect thousands of injuries if a product sold by the million by a major US supplier really was dangerous. Maybe the application is based on a few rare examples going pop with doing much actual harm.
Anyone else had a car window shatter spontaneously? The cause is often temperature change acting on a stress raiser due to slight chip, and as the glass is pre-tensioned to break into a multitude of small blunt fragments rather than sharp shards, it can let go spectacularly. When it happened to me I described it as an explosion, but as explosions go it was tiny – a pop like a balloon and a scattering of glass granules, hardly any energy in it, and nothing like a hand-grenade!
Could be compensation culture. Have you had an accident that wasn't your fault?
Dave