Posted by Samsaranda on 09/04/2018 10:02:46:
Checked the above reference gov.uk/ Poisons and it looks like if your rhubarb has a strong enough oxalic Acid content then it may be covered by the legislation concerning poisons!
Dave W
That's long been the case. Many plants are poisonous. Mostly we avoid the most dangerous ones, and know not to feed dogs chocolate. Fortunately rhubarb stalks don't contain much Oxalic Acid, most of it is in the leaves and we rarely eat any. Anyone think it shouldn't be illegal to process plants for the purpose of concentrating a poison? Often It's not difficult to extract poison from plant products. Beware angry chemists offering pie.
In practice it is really hard to write laws preventing people extracting something really nasty like Ricin that don't also land heavily on innocent activities. What might be fun is to present the establishment with a really tough one. Hundreds of millions of addicts must have tobacco. Supply is regulated but big-profit commerce lobbies powerfully against further restrictions. It's also a very easy product to tax, and the government take is substantial. What would happen if terrorists started lacing food products with concentrated Nicotine obtained from legally bought tobacco? (Nicotine is very poisonous, smokers only get a tiny proportion of it when tobacco burns. )
Truth is governments can only control up to a point. It's possible to reduce the risk of Sulphuric Acid being misused, so they have. Prevention is always better than cure. But there are many, many other misuses where politicians either pass token legislation or kick the can down the road. I'm not entirely unsympathetic: you can't ban knives outright because everyone needs them.
Dave