Posted by John Olsen on 21/07/2020 22:29:20:
I'm a bit miffed by the whole thing too, my ME collection is now complete from WWII up to a couple of months back. I just received 4642, the last one before that being 4635. So I am missing 6 of them, one of them including an article I wrote. I can tell you that they did better during World War 2, despite the ME office being bombed out and ships being torpedoed. As you might imagine, magazines were not a priority cargo at the time, and yet most of them made it out here, 12000 miles away.
During the lock down, I made a few mail orders over Ebay, they have made it all here, apart from one where the Chinese supplier found they were unable to ship the item and refunded me immediately. Ok, there were delays, but international shipping did continue to work. I don't see why the magazines could not have been put aside after printing, and delivered later when things settled down. As it is, we are now faced with trying to get hold of back issues, which are liable to be in short supply.
John
Hello John,
The problem is we use a single agent to fulfill all overseas orders. When distribution halted, we would have had to find a bespoke solution for each individual country. Just putting them in the post and hoping was not an option as we expected a sizeable and unknown proportion would not get through, with no reliable way of knowing exactly what had and hadn't arrived. With most of the office staff on furlough, the only practical option was suspending overseas subscriptions.
A problem with putting magazines to one side in bulk is that advertisers won't pay for space in copies in issues that may not be delivered for six months or more.
If you are very concerned about missing issues leaving you with an incomplete collection, email me as we may be able to sort something out for you.
With thousands of overseas subscribers we can't do a bespoke solution for everyone, but we are able to help a few.
Neil