Circlip,
I doubt very much that Stephen is using ½” bar: more likely in the region of 1″, and hence much more stiff.
I would also like to think that Stephen has used, as Richmond said. “an appropriate speed”. And, let’s face it – he has done the job both successfully and presumably safely, and that is what counts.
I think that we should accept that a lot of jobs are inherantly unsafe. The very fact that a machine with a half or three-quarter hp motor driving it is unsafe. Let’s face it, how many people remove the chuck guards, or don’t have a gearbox cover? What about the great lump of cast iron whirling around on a faceplate? Or an off-centre job being balanced with change-wheels. All of these are inherantly unsafe. Then there is the milling machine with it’s extremely sharp cutters. Or the double-ended grinder with it’s wheels ready to fly apart. And the simplest machine one can get – a hand held pistol drill. I’ve lost count of the number of times when on slow speed the bit has jammed and the drill has turned through 90 degrees before I reacted fast enough to hold it, let alone release the trigger. That drill, by the way, had a power of 400W. I hate to think what one of these more modern higher powered drills would be like. Possibly even more dangerous.
The answer of course, is that it is up to each and everyone of us to exert the appropriate amount of care.
Now, I said that I had read about this idea somewhere else, and I’ve now taken the trouble to look it up. I would refer you to page 96 of Workholding in the Lathe by Tubal Cain in which he shows a 36″ long x 1″ diameter bar being machined in lathe with a between centres distance of 19″. From the description, Tubal Cain was reducing the ends to fit the available bearings, ie a very similar if not the exact job to that of Stephen’s.
I have also looked up the idea of using the tailstock as a sort of travelling steady. Page 17 of Len Mason’s Using the Small Lathe describes the idea. Indeed, Mason describes it as a method of supporting work too long to go between centres.
Circlip, I don’t doubt that you know what you are doing, but when an accepted past master of engineering, Tubal Cain/T.D.Walshaw describes the idea, then I for one know who I am going to listen to. Same with Len Mason.
Finally, I still maintain that there was no need for the sarcasm, or for the superciliousness.
With that, I will go no further, except to say that on my lathe, I can’t even do either of the above ideas, firstly because I haven’t got (yet) a fixed steady, and even if I had, I haven’t got the room at the tailstock end; and secondly, without a major dismantling, I can’t move my tailstock as per Mason!
Regards,
Peter G. Shaw