Emoticons.
Here's what I think about them.
Utter, utter, rubbish.
It seems to me that this is (these are?) another silly idea from someone , possibly a so-called programmer, simply showing off and saying, in effect, "Look how clever I am!". What these people forget is that other mere mortals then have to learn these darned things, firstly what they mean, and secondly how to use them. Frankly I don't want to know, and I don't care about them.
This episode reminds me of a time some eight or so years ago when I was attempting to find a Linux distribution which I could reasonably easily use. Now a few years prior to then, I had tried Suse 9 along with KDE 2 and found it quite palatable so naturally I tried again only to find that Suse was now using KDE4. Unfortunately, when attempting to create a better looking desktop, better looking for me that is, I got myself well and truly screwed up. Why? Because the so-called programmer had seen fit to use a tiny device known as an almond which sat in the very corners of the screen looking for all the world like a screen aberration. I, of course knew nothing of this and so Suse was abandoned in favour, eventually, of Mint with the Mate desktop.
Over the years I have, unfortunately, come across a large number of what can only be described as poor, if not bad, programming where the programmer has quite obviously not thought about the end users, eg, the questionaire where I was asked my occupation (retired) – two questions further on, what does my employer do! Another one, a list of options which was in any old random order rather than the obvious alphabetic order: that same list didn't even contain the obvious "None of these".
I apologise for the rant, and before anyone says anything, I am well aware that there is a cost involved. But if poor programming results in the users going elsewhere, then what then does the cost matter?
Gosh, I feel better for that.
Peter G. Shaw