Forum members aren't the right people to ask about covers because:
- we only care about content. We're already hooked and don't need to be reeled in by a fancy lure! The cover was important to me only once. It was when an issue of MEW caught my eye in a shop and I bought it, the rest is history. The words 'Engineering' and 'Workshop' were important, as was the picture of a machine. Now I mostly ignore the cover apart from the contents bullet list, which I would prefer to stand out boldly rather than be squashed into the footer. But it doesn't matter much: I read the whole magazine anyway.
- many of us are retired gentlefolk for whom all new things are bad. I don't care what it is, change upsets me!
To my mind, covers have been going downhill for years. In the good old days we had advertisements on the front, which is perfection:
In contrast Model Engineer had become disgracefully avant-garde by1942, and cost twice as much. Some young whipper-snapper changed the font and the layout. The content is thin too – the single reader letter, not LETTERS as it claims on the front, is about avoiding explosions in the workshop. I don't think it's wartime black humour.
Backsides are important too. This is from 1964:
After sneaking into the Pony Club an ageing romeo in a Sheepskin Jacket* is pictured introducing a couple of schoolgirls to their first cancer sticks.
Dave
* Only cads, bounders and Lotharios wear Sheepskin Jackets.