I guess it has more to do with diversity than science. But why would you think noting the first woman more appropriate than the first person of colour ( a term that sounds strained to me but that is how it goes these days)? Seems two sides of the same coin to me. First woman, first person of colour, much of a muchness. Reference to either has no bearing on their scientific capabilities.
You possibly need to have lived in the USA to appreciate the full significance of the racial implications, given the relatively recent history of slavery and the continuing bitter oppression of African Americans there, both individual and institutional. Much much more so than in the UK and Commonwealth. The US locals were still stringing them up by the neck from trees as recently as 1981. For them to be included in a lunar landing 40-odd years later is perhaps a sign of progress, and thus worth noting.
Edited By Hopper on 25/01/2023 12:54:48