Posted by John Doe 2 on 07/09/2021 18:32:57:
…
Not quite sure why some recommend cheap equipment – surely here we understand quality, and we know quality costs money? Get decent test leads too, which are not semi-rigid, but nice and flexible.
By good quality gear, look after it properly and it will give superb performance and last a lifetime.
…
Oh no, John has unleashed my hobby horse! I submit the word 'quality' has no place in engineering.
Engineers should start by identifying requirements and then select equipment to meet the requirement. The criteria are Fitness for Purpose and Value for Money, not 'quality'.
Spending money without justification is an engineering sin. You have to engage brain to define exactly what's meant by fit for purpose; for a one off, the answer might be the cheapest available. The very best might be essential in a professional setting.
Lasting a lifetime, whatever that means, is rarely a engineering requirement in the way Capacity, Frequency or Induction ranges might be. Does one really want to pay for expensive calibration, multiple channels and high accuracy?
For ordinary workshop purposes a cheap multimeter is more than good enough, and easily replaced if the worst happens. And the money saved could be spent on something useful like an oscilloscope.
Sky's the limit If quality is the only requirement. A £3636 Keithly isn't bad but you can spend more!
Dave
Spending money on 'quality'