Perhaps we could replace the word Engineer in ME and MEW with a suitable number of asterisks. That way everyone could choose the term that they felt best applied to them (although not necessarily the term that would be chosen by their partners).
Of even greater significance is that while the term Model applies to many but not all of the construction items in ME, it is much less relevant to the majority of those in MEW. Perhaps it is Model that needs to be changed, although I seem to remember that this was all discussed a few years ago. Time for a re–think and more pages of discourse please!
Interestingly, while I am university qualified in a scientific discipline and presumably entitled to describe myself as a Scientist, I am seldom described as such in my professional employment. However, I am a fully recognised member of what, in its field, is a prestigious Engineering society although I have no qualification at any level in Engineering. Go figure!
As I get older I find it less relevant what people call themselves, or what title other people may give them, it is their competence and common sense that keeps them employed. In the harsh world outside of the university it can take as much as three years to knock the PhD out of an employee and make them useful (if it hasn't happened after that time it is generally suggested that they consider finding their way back to a life in the university).
In the meantime I will fight my way into the workshop and continue to make big pieces of metal into smaller pieces of metal, usually wrongly, and call myself a B***** Fool.
Pero
(unnecessary capitalisation of titles by design not necessity
)