Young Christopher…
For years I made nothing but tools. Let me loose in a tool shop with someone elses credit card and I go weak at the knees with pleasure. I love tools.
BUT,
I don’t think that the person with a full time job can really do both satisfactorily. Ours is just not a hasty hobby, and if you take 3 years to knock up a traction engine, its going to take a lot longer, with a lot more forgetting of bits and potential loss of motivation if you have to do all the ordinary tooling, as well as the specialist stuff related ot that job.
Probably accidentally, I went about it the right way, in that for many years I made tools, and though I could yet make a lot more, by the time I started “modelling” there wasn’t a lot I needed, other than a ball turning tool. Boring head, mill, rotary table, dividing head, decent coolant systems, machine vices – I had them all at reasonable cost and great accuracy.
For me its all about what one wants to do and what one enjoys. Tools, there is a great satisfaction in making the next one more easily using the one you have just made, but it does stop there.
A TE or a loco, you can tow kids, contribute at open days, burn coal, get dirty, and discuss engineering and the worlds problems for hours in a very relaxing atmosphere, once you have finishied a longish project. Metre Maid – she is running on air in 7 months, and I hope to have her tested and on track by the autumn, so that will have taken about 15months or so.
However, I found that, despite having loved and worked on the development of IC engines for a lot of my career, I just couldn’t get excited about making one – not because it doesn’t require skill though a single cylinder 2 stroke is hardly taxing either to make or design, but because they don’t do anything on their own. You have to build an aeroplane or a boat to go round it and a lot of commercial people do it a lot better! The trouble is that, once you have run it, its done all its ever going to do. They don’t have a life of their own, you can’t watch all the bits work, and spectators get bored quickly. So they don’t have an added entertainemnt value – for me.
I might make a stationary steam engine -a beam engine say, but much of the above applies to them. In model aircraft terms I can quite see why they could become a hangar queen as you suggest . But a loco or a TE – there IS added value, and a shed load of subsystems (pumps water lifters, injectors, overfilled boilers, cold fires etc etc)and you need to use all of them with some skill to keep the whole going. As you will discover when you drive the Little Samson soon – even the steering is rather feminine and prone to spite.
However, to go full circle – you ain’t going to get a loco, even a simple one like Speedy or Pansy or Metre Maid/Sweet Pea, ready to a decent standard in 15-18 months if you have to stop for tooling.
So you makes your choice. Whichever you enjoy, this not being a rehearsal.
(What next – a 4″ Little Samson, and then a Duchess)
Edited By mgj on 26/02/2011 23:17:54