There may be much finer ones for specialist work but milling does entail a very rapid percussive action on the tool tip, so you may be right about durability. Even so that does seem a large radius.
Carbide insert tooling is a very complex area. Might most of your sources be aimed at general-purpose machining where if a “sharp” internal corner is needed for the component’s function, such as a spline or keyway, a, HSS or solid-carbide slot-drill would be the usual finishing tool?
There is quite a bit of information on Sandvik’s web-site (sandvik[dot]cormorant[dot]com), some useful to us; though generally it is intended for industrial users of hefty great NC machine-tools and we need bear that in mind. For example, we would not normally countenance “down” (in brackets- “climb” ) milling as preferable to “up” (conventional), at least not on the sort of fairly light – or elderly second-hand – machines most of us use. Nor, probably, go into the mathematical extent given.
The text though does bear out your suggestion of durability: the tool edge is subjected to a hammering action as it meets the work edge.
Perhaps the best approach is to accommodate fairly large internal radii where that is permissible, or use a non-insert cutter for finish-milling – while remembering a dead-sharp internal corner can be a stress-raiser.