Posted by Lee Jones 6 on 08/12/2020 08:44:30:
Conducted some more tests this morning as per the suggestions.
One side of the table is lower than the other, but only by 0.02mm over the whole length.
The head-raising test using a square was repeated, this time;
- With the square clamped to the table
- Test was conducted at the centre of the tables
- Gibs were locked before each reading taken
Results were roughly the same (0.6mm over the height of the square [~200m,].
So I've emailed Warco to see if they can provide any insight.
I'll post a copy of their QA sheet when I can find a moment to locate it.
Yeah the QA sheet could make some interesting reading in light of the reality.
I don't think .6mm per 200mm can be blamed on shipping or installation misadventure.
.