It's interesting looking for a suitable countershaft ratio. The back gear is fixed at 1:1 or 4.2:1, the pulleys offer 1:1.4 and 1.4:1 (i.e. two speeds in ratio 1:2). With an angled belt and a tensioning arrangement, I can also add 1:1 on the pulleys.
So the question is, what ratio to use for the countershaft? With a motor speed of 1450 rpm and a bit of help from Excel, countershaft ratios of 1.4:1 and 3.5:1 give an almost perfect spread of speeds:
C/Shaft |
B/Gear |
Pulleys |
Speed |
|
|
|
|
High |
High |
High |
1450 |
High |
High |
Med |
1036 |
High |
High |
Low |
740 |
Low |
High |
High |
580 |
Low |
High |
Med |
414 |
High |
Low |
High |
345 |
Low |
High |
Low |
296 |
High |
Low |
Med |
247 |
High |
Low |
Low |
176 |
Low |
Low |
High |
138 |
Low |
Low |
Med |
99 |
Low |
Low |
Low |
70 |
If I don't want the angled drive on the main pulleys, I can just have a third countershaft ratio between 1.4 and 3.5.
All this begs the question, why do so many machines have really poorly spaced speeds? Is it because the designers didn't have excel?
Neil
Edited By Neil Wyatt on 20/12/2014 12:44:07
Edited By Neil Wyatt on 20/12/2014 12:48:22