Posted by mgj on 23/05/2011 18:33:13:
I beg to differ about carbide and feeds and speeds. Use it all the tipped tools at exactly the same speeds that I use with HSS – works perfectly, with several different makes of tips in both positive and negative rake configurations. For those who don’t believe, go try it.(Yes I know carbide will go a lot faster, but its nonsense to suggest it HAS to – especially on a lathe where coolant is being used, for the very good reason that the coolant can go everywhere which is messy and uncomfortable)
You are using coolant – yes?(At which point a lot of people say they cut dry. Good luck to them, a dose of coolant produces a finer finish and tools last longer. My definition of a good finish is =/-.002″ on diameter, and a mirror shine.
(Selective quote to save space)
Hmmmmm, time for an experiment. I did a series of four trials. Common features were:
Lathe: Harrison M300, running from a true three phase supply
Material: 1.375″ diameter steel EN3B
Depth of Cut: 40 thou, ie, 80 thou off the diameter
Feed: 4 thou per rev
Coolant: Biokool14 from Hallett Oils, or whatever they’re called these days
Tool Tip: Korloy – CCMT postive rake insert 0.4mm nose radius, grade NC3120, general purpose turning of steel
The four trials were:
Trial 1: 260rpm (94fpm), no coolant
Trial 2: 260rpm (94fpm), coolant
Trial 3: 1200rpm (432fpm), coolant
Trial 4: 1200rpm (432fpm), no coolant
Pictures of the four turned surfaces are in one of my photo albums, although my photography is not really good enough to be able to discern the differences.
General appearance:
Trial 1: Surface is rough and inconsistent axially, if wiped with a paper towel it picks up fibres
Trial 2: Looks and feels slightly smoother and is more even axially than 1
Trial 3: Smoother and more shiny than 1 & 2, but is inconsistent axially
Trial 4: Surface feels smoother than 3, is very uniform axially and shiny
Under a magnifying glass:
Trial 1: Surface is dull, torn and uneven
Trial 2: Surface is dull and torn, but not as uneven as 1
Trial 3: Surface is slightly torn, but is also slightly burnished
Trial 4: Surface is much more highly burnished than 3
Swarf:
Trial 1: Came off in small, cold, uneven pieces, generally a few mm long
Trial 2: Came off in small, cold, uneven pieces, generally a few mm long
Trial 3: Came off in long cold curls
Trial 4: Came off in pretty dark blue long curls; longest piece was over a metre
Measurement of Surface Roughness (Ra), taken axially at three points around the periphery (all in micrometres):
Trial 1: 6.01 6.75 6.30 Average=6.35
Trial 2: 4.97 4.52 4.16 Average=4.55
Trial 3: 2.72 2.62 3.05 Average=2.80
Trial 4: 2.12 2.45 2.76 Average=2.44
So, for me, using carbide at high speed without coolant, gives the best finish and appearance. Given what I understand about the cutting process that makes sense to me. It is interesting to note that at slow speeds coolant helps, at higher speeds it doesn’t. I can think of reasons why that might be, but have no definitive proof.
Disclaimer: The above doesn’t mean mgj is wrong, just that it doesn’t work for me!
Regards,
Andrew
Edited By Andrew Johnston on 25/05/2011 21:53:48