Quite a good example of 'value engineering' in action. A point often missed about 'quality' is that you have stop somewhere. If not you end up making expensive stuff the customer doesn't want or need. Don't be surprised he buys cheaper alternatives even if you think they're all crap and he's an idiot!
Just as an example, Martin's chip is indeed a jolly good thing, but reading the Application Notes reveals some issuettes that many engineers would be keen to address:
- the chip and LEDs should be protected by a rectifier diode.
- heat dissipation is a concern so it may not be a good idea just to solder wires on to the chip. Big tags on an SMD chip are often used to help cool the device by fixing it to a copper plane. In other words this baby should be on a PCB designed to keep it cool.
- Best of all is the suggestion that the chip and LED string should be Pulse Width Modulated to reduce dissipation. That's another level of complication and cost.
You have to ask if 'best practice' is necessary or even appropriate. I think Ron's article is spot on. He doesn't claim his circuit is a design template. It's minimalist and it works, job done. I'd argue a more complicated circuit would be overkill on a model locomotive. Different story entirely if the LEDs are for use in a car or an aircraft. I usually use resistor droppers on LEDs, but I'm very taken with Martin's chip – I'm a convert, and would most likely use it without any bells and whistles.
Very interesting comments in this thread. It's all good stuff that keeps the old grey cells well stirred!
Dave
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 28/09/2017 13:53:55
Edited By SillyOldDuffer on 28/09/2017 13:54:17