Yes, two strong men of similar height may be able to lift a Myford lathe onto its cabinet, but strength is not the only factor in safely lifting heavy loads.
You need consider your own height and the height of the lift – once you reach a certain height relative to your body you start to lose efficiency and the load seems to become “heavier” and does become less stable. That height will be individual but typically starts at elbow height or a little above: Nature has had to make our arms the least-efficient order of lever!
Also – never twist your body while lifting something heavy, as that is a very easy route to a dropped load (you are wearing safety shoes…? ) and a badly sprained back.
It goes without saying (doesn’t it…?) that you never lift a heavy item by bending down to it, but by crouching and using your legs to provide the power, keeping your back straight and upright. Those who are parents will know what lifting-course tutors mean when they say toddlers lift even small objects correctly, by an instinct most of us tend to over-ride as grow up.
For short type like me I would consider dividing the lift into two stages, first onto a suitable, strong stand at about half-height in front of the cabinet, then from that to the cabinet, allowing a brief rest if wanted.
….
Engine-cranes….
… how?
Ideally that needs sufficient space to approach the cabinet end-on, and the crane legs being far enough apart to pass each side of the cabinet. Note too, it needs a lot of headroom especially with the jib at further extension above a properly-slung load.
These cranes are designed for a very particular situation: lifting, moving and lowering an engine supported above the crane legs, with vertical lifts, and in a roomy garage. They are of limited use where the front castors cannot pass below or each side of the load, and their manoeuverability even unloaded is poor.
An engine-crane is better than nothing but has serious space and moving limitations.
To re-assemble my machine-shop in a shed with a low ceiling, after a house move, I used tripods made from scaffold-tubes and their proper clips; supporting as applicable a chain-hoist, trailer-winch and block-and-tackle. I did not improvise rope slings but bought proper slings, shackles and eye-bolts, easily-available and not particularly expensive from, e,g, Toolstation or Screwfix. Augmented by screw-jacks, timbers, crow-bars and rollers.
…….
JA –
I agree a machine-tool should allow access round it but unfortunately many of we model-engineers don’t have the luxury of space to arrange ours in the herring-bone or rear-aisle pattern common industrially.
To accommodate my Harrison L5 lathe I had to cut the original motor plinth from the back*, which pushed at least the headstock end a foot out from the wall, build a separate motor frame above and behind the headstock, and cut pieces from the motor-belt / change-wheel guard.
My Myford lathe is against the wall, with the motor-shield / splashback screwed to a batten on the wall.
Milling-machines are very greedy for space, and recently, simply moving my Myford mill a mere six inches sideways and turning it square to the shed gained surprisingly better access to the awkward corner behind it, and to the end of the table.
…
*The scrapped plinth became a useful source of steel plate; some for parts of the travelling-crane I later built for the workshop!