Posted by Bill Dawes on 02/05/2023 08:26:44:
…
What are pros and cons of 5C and ER, would prefer to stick with ER as I already have several collets or is 5C better for lathe work.
Bill D.
I um'd and ah'd about this about 5 years ago and decided to go with ER throughout. The decision depended on what I do in my workshop, which won't suit everyone by a long shot!
Briefly, I always use collets to hold short round stock, not square, hex, or round in long lengths. For this ER is 'good enough', providing a strong grip over a 1mm diameter range, with a reasonable amount of space behind the collet for longer rod. It's cheap and convenient because the same collets are used on my lathe, mill, and vice (with Stephenson Blocks). There are negatives: ER is a tool-holding collet, so round only, and the gripped part of the rod should be as long as the collet's splines. They can nip and hold shorter lengths but it's a bodge, with some risk of coming loose or damaging the collet.
5C is a work-holding system, where collets can be bought to do shapes other than round. They can also hold long stock, and nip short pieces 5C beats ER if any these are important. There are always negatives: the grip diameter range per collet is less than ER, so more collets are needed. More collets means spending my precious spondulicks and finding space to store them.
5C makes good sense in a busy workshop doing repeat work on hex, round, and square stock. ER makes good sense in a one-part-at-a-time workshop, or where round stock dominates, and especially where the owner is short of space and dosh!
I've not regretted going for ER rather than 5C because – in my circumstances – collets are a secondary work-holding method, and almost exclusively needed for round stock only. Only once have I thought, 'this would be easy with 5C'. In practice there's always an alternative, usually a 4-jaw, the disadvantage of them being set-up time.
Dave